  

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Threat to Google Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4tm-services.com/2009/05/eu-threat-to-google-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4tm-services.com/2009/05/eu-threat-to-google-analytics/</link>
	<description>Social Media Specialists for Conferences, Events and Campaigns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 10:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Sim</title>
		<link>http://4tm-services.com/2009/05/eu-threat-to-google-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4tm-services.com/?p=783#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Steven,

Thanks for your insight. That&#039;s interesting - and would make implementation of such a law particularly complex. Would individual sites have to declare that they&#039;re using GA&#039;s cookie and ask approval to use it? Or, as you suggest, would a single approval to Google be sufficient.

I wonder if the whole third party cookie issue has even been considered by legislators. In any case, I would have thought that legislation is unnecessary, as all leading browsers can already be configured to disallow third party cookies like Google Analytics and even first party cookies for the ultra-paranoid.

David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>Thanks for your insight. That&#8217;s interesting &#8211; and would make implementation of such a law particularly complex. Would individual sites have to declare that they&#8217;re using GA&#8217;s cookie and ask approval to use it? Or, as you suggest, would a single approval to Google be sufficient.</p>
<p>I wonder if the whole third party cookie issue has even been considered by legislators. In any case, I would have thought that legislation is unnecessary, as all leading browsers can already be configured to disallow third party cookies like Google Analytics and even first party cookies for the ultra-paranoid.</p>
<p>David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Devijver</title>
		<link>http://4tm-services.com/2009/05/eu-threat-to-google-analytics/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Devijver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4tm-services.com/?p=783#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t looked into the technical details of how Google Analytics works, but technically GA only needs one cookie per browser which will be reused for all sites using GA.

So, technically, users would need to agree to accept the one GA cookie, and not agree to the use of that cookie per website using GA.

Steven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t looked into the technical details of how Google Analytics works, but technically GA only needs one cookie per browser which will be reused for all sites using GA.</p>
<p>So, technically, users would need to agree to accept the one GA cookie, and not agree to the use of that cookie per website using GA.</p>
<p>Steven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
